Life Is An End Activity Based Solely Upon Us Through...

Joel Osteen and Aristotle explain happiness as an end activity based solely upon us through choice, virtue, and character. They do so in exploring the idea of happiness being a choice, whether it is a virtuous activity, and the content of character and if it affects the end result of happiness. Osteen and Aristotle explore ideas that concur and oppose each other, reaching some of the same points; despite living over two thousand years apart. Osteen a very well known pastor, gives a sermon on modern views of how to be happy. He makes it very clear throughout his sermon that happiness is a choice. For example he clearly says, â€Å"Happiness is a choice†. He also states, â€Å"You only allow things you want to frustrate you† here he is implying that you can allow things to frustrate you. If you can allow something to frustrate you, or be unbothered by it then it becomes a choice. Osteen also touches on the subject of your character affecting your happiness. In the video Osteen states, â€Å"Life is to short to live it negative and grumpy† so Osteen is saying that if you live your life negative and grumpy, and that is the outlook you have on life and it’s your character to be that way you wont be happy. The last big point Osteen makes is to stay focused on what you want and be happy and find the good in what you have. One of the quotes he uses for this is, â€Å"If you don t learn to be happy where you are, you’ll never get to where you want to be†. Osteen is saying to be happy where you areShow MoreRelatedBeyond The Edges Of Planet Earth1509 Words   |  7 Pagestravelled to in hopes to revive a once dull and unsatisfying life, Planet Z is an escape. It is an escape from negativity and discomfort that survives in neighboring planets. But how might one get to the point where they truly feel they have reached a fulfilling, happy life? By coming to Planet Z. On Planet Z, you will see, that we offer nothing less than a warm and welcoming community. There are homes, big and small, businesses owned solely by the people of Planet Z, and a school for the children.Read MoreBiomedical Ethics: Cloning and Sales of Organs3677 Words   |  15 Pagescloning and selling organs is natural and an expected reaction by the human mind. What has not yet been conceived upon first hearing is strange and unnatural and the mind attempts to disseminate the new and strange information. However, as this work will show, the cloning and sale of human organs is a scientific breakthrough unequaled by any before and offers great promise for a better life for many individuals. II. What is Cloning? It is first necessary to examine precisely what cloning is. CloningRead MoreBiomedical Ethics: Cloning and Sale of Organs4459 Words   |  18 Pageshas not yet been conceived upon first hearing is strange and unnatural and the mind attempts to disseminate the new and strange information. However, as this work will show, the cloning and sale of human organs is a scientific breakthrough unequaled by any before and offers great promise for a better life for many individuals and perhaps by extension society. This work will additionally question the ethics of the choices on who will be in receipt of these cloned life-saving organs. II. What isRead MoreFilm Analysis : The Problem Of Administrative Evil Dirty Hands3391 Words   |  14 PagesFilm Analysis – The Problem of Administrative Evil Dirty Hands I’ll lie when I must, and I have contempt for no one. I wasn’t the one who invented lying. It grew out of a society divided into classes, and each one of us has inherited it form birth. We shall not abolish lying by refusing to tell lies, but by using every mean at hand to abolish classes. (as cited in Bok ,1999, p 165-166). What are dirty hands? The concept of dirty hands in politics is a widely believed view that those in politicsRead MoreEssay about An Ethical Theory Applied to Business Organizations2816 Words   |  12 Pagesessay is to establish whether there is an ethical theory that can be successfully applied to business organizations. In order to answer this question, it is necessary first to define the major ethical theories, which are utilitarianism, deontology and virtue ethics, before determining whether there are any other options. After that, the ethical needs, problems and limitations of work organizations will have to be examined so that the different theories can be evaluated in this context. It will also beRead MoreWhich Theory of Ethics Do You Believe to Be Most Accurate or Useful in2848 Words   |  12 Pagesessay is to establish whether there is an ethical theory that can be successfully applied to business organisations. In order to answer this question, it is necessary first to define the major ethical theories, which are utilitarianism, deontology and virtue ethics, before determining whether there are any other options. After that, the ethical needs, problems and limitations of work organisations will have to be examined so that the different theories can be evaluated in this context. It will also beRead MoreBusiness Ethics Test Questions with Answers Essay22425 Words   |  90 PagesEuropean Union 8th Directive b. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act c. The COSO framework d. European Union 7th directive Answer: c 38. Which of the following statements is true of the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations? a. It improves financial reporting through a combination of controls and governance standards called the External Control—Integrated Framework. b. It is an external mechanism that seeks to ensure ethical corporate governance. c. It describes control as encompassing those elements of an organizationRead Moreethical decision making16006 Words   |  65 Pagesthese, it sometimes feels like there are no â€Å"right† answers. What are your reactions to the three ethical dilemmas? What other information would be helpful to know about these situations to make a decision? CHAPTER FOCUS Virtue or Character Ethics Principle-Based Ethics: Developing Moral Rules Utilitarian Theories: Doing the Most Good for the Most People Deontological Theories: Balancing Rights and Obligations Justice in Health Care Values and Health Policy Ethics of Care EthicalRead More Reading and Censorship of the Harry Potter Novels Essay5573 Words   |  23 Pagesmost popular reasons for censoring Harry Potter is that the books are centered around a magical community. The plot revolves around Harry and his friends as they learn how to become wizards and witches at Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry. Through Harry’s adventures, there are allusions to the real world that may help children in their learning process, but there are those who do not want to expose their children to the large amount of witchcraft portrayed in the books. The question of censoringRead MoreEssay on Data Encryption4128 Words   |  17 Pagesencrypt and decrypt data electronically. By deploying sophisticated mathematical algorithm into the process, it combines the original data with one or more a serial of numbers or strings of characters, as known as â€Å"keys† privately and solely owned by sender and/or recipient. Cipher text is generated as an e nd result of this process. The computer aided data encryption is much more accurate, efficient and reliable compared to the ancient methods. Encryption has a very long history,1 which can

Britain And The European Union Essay Research free essay sample

Britain And The European Union Essay, Research Paper ? We have our ain dream and our ain undertaking. We are with Europe, but non of it. We are linked, but non combined. We are interested and associated, but non absorbed. ? 1 Winston Churchill? s celebrated quotation mark competently describes Britain? s purposes towards European integrating. In this essay I shall try to demo that Britain? s relationship towards European integrating has been one of a loath brotherhood, back uping free trade and reciprocally good cooperation, while trying to distance itself from economic and cultural? integrity? with Europe, and I will complete by depicting the effects on Britain? s sovereignty since fall ining the European Union. The term integrating can be understood, in context of the European Union, as a state of affairs of fusion between separately sovereign states into a corporate organic structure, sufficient to do that organic structure a feasible whole. A to the full integrated European Union could be seen to hold two possible results. Either a ) A Federalist or? stewed? brotherhood, where all member provinces give up their single sovereignty and organize a superstate that would be an economic universe power, or B ) A Confederalist or? salad saloon? brotherhood, where each member province has its ain topographic point in a continental confederation, keeping national sovereignty and separately conducive, through trade and cooperation, to organize a greater whole.2 Throughout the 1970? s and 80? s Britain? s aspiration for a Europe unified through trade and cooperation arose from a desire to keep complete control and sovereignty over its ain personal businesss. The history of the British Empire and its place as leader of the Commonwealth in add-on to its history of good association with the United States3, left many in Britain to believe that it could still keep its prominent planetary function and historical position of universe leader in political and economic personal businesss. However, the fact that Britain had to accept that there was a demand for trade barriers to fall and new markets to open, coupled with the realization that it could non be successfully as a separate economically independent entity. There was the acknowledgment by some that the lone hope to achieve these ends was to fall in the EC as? there was small range for a United Kingdom outside the community, particularly when the six ( Germany, France, Italy, Belgium, Luxembourg and the Netherlands ) had done so visibly better than the UK4? Since? seize with teething the slug? and deriving its rank to the so called European Community in 1973, Britain has vocally announced that it would prefer the? salad saloon? version of integrating to the? stewed? version. For illustration, Margaret Thatcher spoke in Bruges in September 1988 and she said she? sought to put down a vision of a Europe of crowned head provinces, economically well more broad, deregulated and interdependent, but a Europe based basically on cooperation instead than integration5? . Within the EU, Britain could work with the other member states to warrant its economic involvements and effort to keep its influence and go on to keep sway in universe personal businesss. Inside the EU Britain would ? be able to model the trading systems of Europe to its advantage. As an foreigner, it feared being on the uninfluential having terminal of determinations made by the combined power of the original? six? 6? . The EU has stated explicitly that its aims are? to put the foundations of an of all time closer brotherhood among the peoples of Europe # 8230 ; the changeless betterment of the life and working conditions of the people, and the decrease of differences in wealth between regions7? . And so, Britain has had to anneal its position that Europe could last as a system of wholly independent yet concerted provinces in order to benefit from the advantages, such as unfastened markets and free trade with other members, which is offered by rank in the EU. United kingdoms determination to fall in the EU was a considered one, to derive economic benefits and submit to some loss of single control over societal affairs that concern all members of the Union. However It appears that they want to? hold their bar and eat it excessively? , by deriving the economic benefits of brotherhood and non subjecting to any societal enterprises proposed by the EU. For Example in 1989 the all the member provinces adopted a Community Charter of the Fundamental Social Rights of Workers, all that is except Britain, this charter was supposed to be a cardinal edifice block in the building of Europe, yet Britain rejected it stating that it would interrupt its vision of free and unfastened trade among the member provinces of the European Economic Community. This action is a presentation of Britains efforts at avoiding the creative activity of the Federalist European Superstate. Sovereignty can be defined rather merely as the supreme authorization to non merely declare jurisprudence but create it, deducing this power from a public who have given up their personal sovereignty and power and vested it in the sovereign8, in the instance of Britain the crowned head is the Government, since the King passed sovereignty to the parliament over clip. Britain? s ability to support its sovereignty has been efficaciously compromised in the first case by the really act of fall ining the EU. The declared purpose of the EU, to make an? of all time closer brotherhood? , defines a certain way that the member provinces must follow. The way may be broad to let a figure of different paths to the intended end, but in the terminal it restricts the autonomous states ability to take its ain class of action both economically and socially. Three specific cases of the eroding of Britains sovereignty are a ) The European Communities Act 1972, which established a rule that European Law would ever predominate over British jurisprudence in the event of a struggle, efficaciously diminishing the domination of Parliament. B ) The Single European Act 1988 ( SEA ) withered sovereignty more by replacing unanimity regulation, that is, any states power to veto, with bulk vote in certain countries. hence the power of the European Parliament over Britain was further enhanced. And eventually degree Celsiuss ) The pact of Maastricht 1993 farther empowered the European Parliament, it can now block new statute law but can non itself initiate new statute law. The European tribunal was besides given the power to ticket member states9. These illustrations show that Britains ability to support its sovereignty truly relates to its ability to negociate within the model of the pacts that it marks, and besides the extent to which it can decelerate the procedure of the eroding of its sovereignty down. United kingdoms actions refering the Individual European Currency are a good illustration of this. Because under a Individual European Currency Parliament would lose sovereignty over its currency militias, the Central Bank involvement rate, and the sum of currency minted, since no Act of Parliament could be used to put these things. This sovereignty would go through to the European Central Bank10. Britain decided to keep itself out of the debut of the Euro and see what reaction the new currency would make on the universe market. It presently plans to fall in the pecuniary brotherhood in 2003. In decision, Britains relationship to European integrating since 1973 has been one that sees this as a matter-of-fact necessity. Britain would prefer a? salad saloon? Europe, with crowned head and single provinces adding their ain spirit to an economic Confederate of European provinces, though it will profess societal integrating when it can non avoid it. The extent to which Britain can support its sovereignty, has been shown to be limited, it can negociate to set up good understandings with other members and truly detain the effects of brotherhood. Bibliography: 1 ) Almdal, Preben. Aspects of European Integration Denmark, Odense University Press, 1986. 2 ) Edwards, Geoffrey. ? Britain and Europe? in Jonathan Story ( erectile dysfunction ) The New Europe: Politicss, Government and Economy since 1945. Oxford, Blackwell Publishers, 1993. 3 ) Stuart, N. New Britain Handbook on Europe, New Britain, 1996 hypertext transfer protocol: //web.ukonline.co.uk/stuart.n2/nbrit/nbhandeu1.html 4 ) Wise, Mark. A ; Gibb, Richard. Single Market to Social Europe: The European Community in the 1990? s. Essex, Longman Scientific and Technical, Longman GroupUK Ltd. 5 ) The Columbia Dictionary of Quotations is licensed from Columbia University Press. Copyright? 1993